free software writes "NEW
YORK- Americans have long avowed that their
country’s mission is to spread democracy throughout the world. As indeed
American and Filipino historians have noted, the idea reached the shores of the
Philippines
where it was implanted shortly before the beginning of the 20th century. And
now in the first decade of the 21st century George W. Bush is obsessed with the
same notion of imposing American-style democracy in the Arab world.
A new book - “Failed States: The Abuse of
Power and the Assault on Democracy” - overturns that self-image of America as the
“beacon of freedom and democracy lighting the way for the rest of the world.”
Written by the famed polemicist Noam
Chomsky, the book excoriates that American image. “It is a lie,” he bluntly
says, “and it has always been.” He exposes what he describes as “the rot of the
shining city on the hill, from its foundations to its steeples.” In its many
interventions, Chomsky notes, Washington
has acted to frustrate the will of the people, often by supporting those
engaged in the most chilling violence. He cites cases of how it overthrew
democratic governments in Iran, Chile, Guatemala and a long list of others,
paying lip service to democracy while doing all it could to rig the outcome.
But he explains that there is a “rational consistency” to the
inconsistency between words and actions. And he says the record shows that the US does indeed
back democracy abroad “if and only if it is consistent with its strategies and
economic interests.”
Chomsky asks: “What is a failed state?”
And he answers: “It is one that fails to provide security for the population,
to guarantee rights at home or abroad or to maintain functioning democratic
institutions.” And with this definition he concludes that the US is the
“world’s biggest failed state.” He strongly points out Washington’s
woeful efforts to protect Americans from terror attacks, in one instance
lavishing more resources on the imaginary threat from Fidel Castro’s Cuba than on
the all too real menace of Al Qaeda in the Arab world.
He goes on to cite how the US ignored the
Geneva Conventions by its treatment of prisoners of war like those in
Guantanamo and of Iraqi civilians; flouted the United Nations Charter, which
allows the use of force only when the necessity of self-defense is instant and
overwhelming, standards hardly met by the 2003 invasion of Iraq; defied the
World Court, which in the 1980’s held Washington guilty of unlawful use of
force against Nicaragua, a ruling it simply rejected. And he adds acidly that
America exempts itself from the rules it demands from everyone else.
The American system, Chomsky writes on,
is “rotten,” and he faults US leaders from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Harry S.
Truman to John F. Kennedy for their pursuit of international domination.
Just like any other polemicist, Chomsky
is selective in his materials. He argues, for example, that the American invasion of Iraq has unleashed a wave of
terrorism in that country, but he has little interest in the bombers and
beheaders there. He dismisses the acts of those who would want American power
deployed to thwart genocide in other countries. Chomsky’s book may sound
ludicrously overblown to American officials and readers, but his fierce
excoriation may very well serve as a kind of wake-up call to Washington’s officialdom. A reminder that
America may indeed be the only great power in the world today, or even, as Bill
Clinton once put it, “the world’s indispensable nation,” but absolutely not
forever and ever.
Today, under the aegis of George W. Bush,
the United States is
becoming increasingly unpopular, primarily because of his administration’s Iraq war
policy, worldwide. Interestingly, the recent primary victory of a
neophyte in American politics, whose fierce anti-Iraq war stance has made him a
political star overnight, presages dire tidings for Bush’s Republicans in the
mid-term elections this year and probably in the presidential polls of 2008.
It was a vivid demonstration of how deep is the American people’s hostility
toward Bush and his war policies not just among Democrats but other Americans
who shudder at the thought of losing more of their sons and daughters in the Middle East conflicts.
The New York Times put it quite
succinctly in its editorial that the political rebellion in Connecticut that
befell an advocate and supporter of Bush’s war was a rare phenomenon by irate
voters who have been unnerved by a war that has “degenerated into a desperate
bloody mess that has turned much of the world” against the United States of
America.
Vol. XV, No. 20
"