MANILA – This was the question uppermost in the minds of Filipinos as the Sandiganbayan Special Division prepared to hand down the verdict on the plunder and perjury cases of President Joseph Estrada on September 12.
Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio said the prosecution team is confident that Estrada will be convicted and Rene Saguisag, co-lead counsel for Estrada, said the defense panel is resigned to a verdict of conviction.
He said the three justices of the Sandiganbayan Special Division are bound by the pronouncements of the Supreme Court which have supposedly rendered virtually nil any chance of an acquittal.
“The
alignment of the stars is against us. Joseph Estrada’s fate was
decided on January 20, 2001 when an overwhelming majority of the
members of the Supreme Court went to EDSA to swear in Mrs. Arroyo
into office," he said.
“The
entire system is against us, the Supreme Court, the administration,
the special division. The Supreme Court has already declared that
President Estrada is an evil person; we don’t expect a lower court
to tell the SC that it was wrong. Still, we are hoping against hope
that the justices will see this case the way we see it,"
Saguisag added.
He
said despite his predicament, Estrada is buoyed by the continued
support of the masses and his family.
Earlier,
Malacanang has indicated that President Arroyo is inclined to pardon
Estrada if he is convicted.
This
came as a survey conducted by the Social Weather Stations said
majority of Filipinos have more trust on Estrada than Arroyo and that
they believe the former president was not guilty of plunder.
The
police, meanwhile, massed its forces for any eventuality in metro
Manila and throughout the country should the court convict Estrada
and his supporters stage violent demonstrations in reaction to the
verdict.
National
Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales and Interior Secretary Ronaldo
Puno have said have hinted at a possible pardon saying the President
is eager to seek greater national reconciliation.
“Our
only consolation is that every survey shows that the people believe
in Erap’s innocence. That’s our vindication," Saguisag said.
The
graft court issued an order to PNP chief Oscar Calderon to produce
Estrada, 70, in court at 9 a.m. of Sept. 12.
Estrada
faces life imprisonment if found guilty. The government fears the
masses could riot in Manila.
Estrada
maintains he is innocent on charges of taking gambling payoffs,
tobacco tax kickbacks and unreported income from hidden businesses.
“I
am confident that I will be acquitted if the court would only base
their decision on the merits of the case," he told Reuters in a
phone interview Sept. 7 from his Tanay rest house where he is
detained.
“They
have failed to present any strong evidence to support these
fabricated charges."
Presiding
Justice Teresita de Castro and Associate Justices Francisco Villaruz
Jr. and Diosdado Peralta completed hearings in the six-year case last
June.
State
prosecutors submitted 626 pages of case summaries based on the
testimony of 76 witnesses and documentary evidence.
Estrada’s
lawyers presented 276 pages of summaries from about 80 witnesses.
Estrada took the witness stand 11 times from March to June 2006.
In
March, Charlie “Atong” Ang, a close associate of Estrada, pleaded
guilty to diverting P130 million of tobacco excise taxes and was
sentenced to at least two years and four months in jail.
“We
have not contemplated that scenario of an acquittal,” said
Villa-Ignacio.
Villa-Ignacio
even displayed on a stand beside his office desk a caricature of him
in a boxer’s stance, standing over the fallen figure of Estrada
inside a boxing ring.
He
said the picture was a birthday gift from his students at the Ateneo
Law School, who he said share his confidence of a guilty verdict.
Villa-Ignacio
said he is drawing his faith from two pronouncements of the graft
court affirming that there is sufficient evidence on record which
would result to a conviction.
The
first was the denial of Estrada’s Demurrer to Evidence in 2004 when
the special division declared that the prosecution’s evidence,
unless sufficiently rebutted by the defense, is enough to convict
Estrada. The second was when the court denied Estrada’s petition
for bail in 2005 on the ground that the evidence against him is
strong.
“With
that kind of evidence, I don’t see how the court will appreciate
these differently. But if he still bucks the odds and gets an
acquittal, maybe I will start shooting everyone in sight,"
Villa-Ignacio joked.
“If,
even after all the efforts we have exerted in this case, former
President Estrada is still acquitted, there will always be that
feeling of disappointment," he said.
Saguisag
voiced disappointment at the statement of Villa-Ignacio on Estrada’s
chances of acquittal.
“What
we’d really like to hear from Villa-Ignacio is that after this case
is concluded, he will start really working on (former Justice
Secretary Hernando) Nani Perez. As we have said from the start,
justice in this government is being administered with an evil eye and
an uneven hand," Saguisag said.
The
Office of the Ombudsman has recommended the indictment of Perez on
graft and misconduct charges based on the complaint of extortion
filed against him by former Manila Rep. Mark Jimenez.
Estrada
has accused Perez of pressuring him to flee the country after his
ouster in 2001, allegedly promising to make special arrangements to
ensure that the former president will not be prosecuted.
Villa-Ignacio
said under the law, Sen. Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada will “not be
touched" even if he is convicted of plunder along with his
father and lawyer Edward Serapio.
“He
will stay in the Senate. There are still a lot of processes, appeals
in the Sandiganbayan and up to the Supreme Court. He will still be a
senator unless he is convicted and the Supreme Court affirms it,"
Villa-Ignacio said.
He
said if the prosecution wins, the government might have to settle for
a lot less than the P4.2 billion that it is seeking to recover from
Estrada.
“We
could not focus on the (forfeiture of the defendants?) properties.
The
prosecution panel was too busy gathering evidence for the trial. We
are going to use the general writ issued by the Sandiganbayan to get
as much as we can. But at present, what we have attached is far below
P1 billion," he said.
Among
Estrada assets already covered by the court’s freeze order are the
P213 million in a bank account of the Estrada Muslim Youth
Foundation.
Villa-Ignacio
said he is unsure if the so-called “Boracay” mansion and the
other houses allegedly built by Estrada are covered by the general
writ.
Sandiganbayan
chief sheriff Edgardo Urieta said only 50 seats have been allotted
for the media on promulgation day.
Three
first rows in the right side of the courtroom have been set aside for
the prosecution and its guests that will include former Ombudsman
Simeon Marcelo, private prosecutors, Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez
and other officials of the Office of the Ombudsman.
The
same number of rows is reserved for Estrada’s family and
supporters.
The remaining seats are to be given to other parties on a first-come,
first-served basis.
Urieta reiterated that no still and video cameras, cellular phones, two-way
radio handsets and tape recorders will be allowed in the courtroom.
He said an audio-only monitor would be set up at the second floor
rightwing of the building where recordings of the proceedings would
be permitted for those who could not be accommodated in the
courtroom.
The Special Division approved Estrada’s request to visit his
102-year-old mother, Dona Mary Ejercito, who has been confined at the
San Juan Medical Center since Aug. 10 and who is reported to be in a
precarious condition.