MANILA – The poor implementation of the 1996 government-Moro National Liberation Front Peace Agreement, whose 10th anniversary was Sept. 2 could have long-term repercussions on peace and development in Mindanao.
The MNLF has blamed the Philippine government for failing to carry out the agreement, whose signing silenced the
guns in Muslim Mindanao and returned peace to the country's second biggest island.
The government has denied the accusation
and has insisted it has fulfilled its obligations under the agreement, which
was signed by President Fidel V. Ramos for the state and by Nur Misuari for the
MNLF.
MNLF and influential Muslim leaders said
lapses in the implementation of the historic treaty could damage the future of Mindanao in many ways:
First, they give Moro Islamic Liberation
Front (MILF) leaders doubts about government sincerity in giving Moros
meaningful autonomy and can upset the continuing peace talks between government
and MILF negotiators in Kuala Lumpur.
If the GRP-MNLF Peace Agreement is a failure, what incentive does the MILF have
to remain at the table?
Second, the lapses could fan greater MNLF
resentment against Manila
and summon retired and active guerrillas to resume their rebellion against the
government. An MNLF-MILF alliance would be lethal to the government and the
military, analysts said.
Third, they threaten the stability of the
ARMM (Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao) government and could cause its
dissolution. The Autonomy Act that created ARMM, although criticized by the
MNLF as violative of the spirit of the peace agreement, still offers a
reasonable option to the Muslim demand for total independence.
Fourth, a breakdown in peace and
stability could cause major donor Countries -the United States, Japan, China,
the European Union to reconsider their official development assistance to
Mindanao and withdraw their support from the region altogether.
Fifth, a deterioration of conditions
imperils the Philippines’
standing with the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and could
isolate Manila
from the Muslim world.
The 1996 Final Peace Agreement brought a
two-decade rebellion by the MNLF against Manila
to an end and restored peace to Mindanao and
outlying islands.
A demand by the Muslim rebels for total
sovereignty, occasioned by government neglect, Christian bias, Moro-bashing,
disrespect for Muslim culture, religion and traditions, ignited the Misuari-led
rebellion.
Looming in the background was the
centuries-old strife between the Muslims and a succession of colonizers,
including Spain and the United States,
helped along by Christian mercenaries, opportunists and landgrabbers.
Some historians say the massacre by a
secret Armed Forces command of at least 28 among a group of more than 200
Moro military trainees in Corregidor in 1968 hastened the launching of the MNLF as
a secessionist movement. The 28 had mutinied because of the poor food and
unhealthy condition in the camp and the mission of the so-called Jabidah
Operation they were being trained for. Chosen for being bahasa Melayu
speakers, their mission was to serve as a fifth column in the invasion of Sabah.
The war cost thousands of lives among the
Philippine military, the MNLF and civilians, maimed and wounded thousands more,
destroyed billions of pesos in property, set back the education of Muslim
youths and worsened economic and social conditions in Mindanao.
The end gave the AFP rest, saved the
government billions in resources, launched a period of reconstruction, and what
could have been a new era of trust between Manila and Muslim Mindanao.
The 1996 agreement gave the Autonomous
Region of Muslim Mindanao a self-rule concept provided for in the 1987
Constitution.
It prompted the surrender of Nur Misuari
and his transformation from guerrilla to government leader with his election in
1996 as ARMM governor.
Hundreds of MNLF guerrillas received
amnesty and were integrated either into the AFP or into the Philippine National
Police. The MNLF gained observer status in the OIC.
Full economic aid never came, according
to MNLF and civilian leaders.
Misuari’s leadership, however, was
short-lived. The government charged him with mismanagement, corruption and
incompetence. He had actually improved on the way the ARMM was managed by
earlier governors. And, like his two predecessors, he suffered from the
ARMM’s not being funded properly.
In 2001, he was accused of leading a brushfire
rebellion against the state. He fled to Malaysia,
where the police hunted him down, arrested him and deported him to Manila. He has been in
detention since, although he has not been formally charged. His trial has not
begun.