People often equate liberalism with the Democratic Party so I cannot blame them for labeling me as one among them. I am not a liberal advocate neither do I intend to become one. But let me elaborate my thoughts so that I would not be mistaken as liberal activist. Being a Democrat does not necessarily mean being liberal in the same manner as being a Republican does not necessarily mean being conservative. Democratic idealism is entirely different from realism. I am inclined to believe the latter rather than live the world of idealism. Ideas are concepts within the level of the intellect and would remain so unless processed into reality. The real world is a complex interplay of empirical phenomenon hence the real test of leadership principles and management.
The Bush presidency runs into the gamut
of conservative idealism that is why I was never impress by his leadership and
foreign policy decisions. And any leader (I would say) either in the corporate
or political world cannot run an effective management if he is imprisoned
within the closet of idealism. Conservatism, either it is Republican or
Democratic is a concrete example of what I call “ideological
entrapment<D>”.
I have and will always be proud that I am
a faithful advocate of the “center<D>” and moderate Democrats such
as former Virginia governor Mark Warner, former President Bill Clinton and
Timothy Kaine, the newly elected governor of Virginia. Although, I am not a
fanatic but my values and beliefs have always been identified with them. Let me
be specific with what I meant by moderate Democratic values, which I am
strongly and passionately in love.
I believe that abortion is morally wrong
but exceptions have to be made such as when the life of the mother is at stake.
I am convinced that religion is fundamental to human existence but I cannot
accept that only one religion is legitimate and that salvation is only possible
through religion. Religion is not the way to salvation but only one among the
means to an end. Respect for one’s religion should be absolute. The
atheists have the right to their own beliefs but someone Supreme and Higher
than human existence cannot be ignored in the law of order and beauty within
the world. . I believe in the sanctity of marriage but the right of homosexual
group to be married should not be curtailed. Tax cuts is in essence good for
the people but few cuts from our pocket should be reasonable enough if it means
more roads and good service from the government. Tax cut should not be extended
to the wealthy because they have more in life. Those who have more in life
should make the supreme duty and honor to sacrifice for the sake of the less
privilege. I think that the government has the obligation to help the poor but
it should be exercised with control and moderation least it will encourage
dependency and laziness. People who receive something from the government as
subsidy should render civil and government service. The idea of equal
distribution is heavenly but those who have worked more should be given more in return. Equality
is not absolute least it will contrast the idea of fairness. But he who has in
life should exercise restraint and humility otherwise he may fall into the trap
of what are purely externals and worldly affairs. The issue of environment
should be treated vis-à-vis population. I am extremely oppose to the
destruction and cutting of trees for corporate profits but would favor a
housing development within a forested area if it will cater the needs of the
homeless. But again, homelessness and poverty can be better addressed if there
is an effective implementation of population control. Hence I favor the use of
artificial contraceptives over the Catholic Church’s natural or rhythm method.
Stem cell research should be given the chance to work. Scientific research
should not be constrained and measured within the context of Thomistic and
Catholic philosophy and teachings.
With the Democrats in control of both
chambers of Congress, i.e., the Senate and House of Representatives, I can see
some “light<D>” in immigration reform. Although it is not the top
priority but certainly there got to be something before the 2008 Presidential
election. I have personally campaigned for Democratic Party especially among my
classmates at Georgetown University during the recent election because of
immigration issues. I do not believe that the Philippines or GMA’s
administration is better off with a Republican House and Senate. It does not
matter whether it is Republican or Democratic Congress because the voting
record would still be the same in terms of foreign aid and policy. All American
lawmakers will always be looking after the security of his/her nation. A
Democrat or Republican lawmaker will always be advancing U.S. interests before
that of others.
The Philippine problem on Muslim
insurgency in Mindanao area has been a “speck in the eye<D>” to
the Philippine government years before the September 11, 2001 attack on the
U.S. soil. Any comparison for that matter is a complete fallacy and to my
judgment, does not fall within the line of good argument. The problem of the
Philippine government is not terrorism but corruption and exploitation of the
Mindanao crisis. While the U.S. effort is a big factor is the resolution of
that crisis but the total success is a matter of political will rather
international dependence.