Few days ago, I had a good and short conversation about religion and salvation with some smart guys from FOREX in Alexandria, Virginia and the same topic came up at a party in Manassas where Born Again Christians and Catholics argue about the authenticity of their own religion.
I have never been open about my faith since I left the portals of Baguio City more than fifteen years ago. Although I am still a practicing Catholic and have no intentions of leaving the institution but I have avoided discussing it in public for two major reasons. First, I have pursued a non-Thomistic philosophy in the Graduate School and re-oriented myself with the study of Oriental philosophy especially Indian Philosophy and have farther engaged myself in discovering the meaning of existential and phenomenological existence. Second, I have always believed that faith is a personal matter and any debate over religion is a useless intellectual exercise.
Most often I would play the devil’s
advocate among friends but never in my wildest dreams did I ever think of a
debate on religion. I am neither proposing a debate in this paper nor am I
encouraging one but only to encourage my friends to follow their passion and
embrace whatever religion that serve best their own conscience. After all, any
religion does not have an exclusive right and patent over the issue of
salvation. Anyone who believes the contrary is still imprisoned within the
cocoon of Vatican I.
Also, I don’t want to sound and appear
like a pastor or a priest, preaching sermon to my flock. I have always tried to
keep my faith within my pocket and my religious practices within my own closet
because I am always accounted and responsible for whatever I do with my life.
It is not a general conclusion but my experience has told me that those who are
very vocal about their church’s involvement and religious charismatic brouhaha
are the number backbiters on earth. Those who are actively involve in the
Church would always have the tendency to blow their own horn and announce to
the entire world their recent charity work and among themselves, there is a
deep silent competition as who has the best fashion and jewelry during this or
that occasion. I am not pointing at anyone but just an observation while
working in the Church myself. I could be wrong and if I am, so be it.
As I continue with my proposition on
salvation as an ecumenical and generic term, let me explain two significant
words related to this argument, i.e., salvation and God.
All religions whether it be Christianity
(Catholics, Baptists, Episcopalians, Born Again, etc.) Hinduism and Islam have
two things in common namely, worship of the Supreme Creator and salvation of
mankind.
Salvation is a private affair to every
individual, of which no religion has exclusive possession and monopoly. It is a
reward resulting from one’s good relationship with his God. Different religions
may offer different ways to be saved but ultimately it is the individual who
has full responsibility to say “yes or
no” to his own eternal destiny.
All of us are traveling to the same
destination but only through different routes and directions. But certainly
there are no short cuts because all roads are winding and crooked. The only
road that is straight and full of short cuts is the way the way to eternal
damnation.
If there is no salvation outside
Christianity or Catholicism then billions of people are already condemned to
hell even before they see the light of existence. This defies the purpose and
law of creation and certainly it contradicts the very nature of God Himself.
This leads to the idea of pre-destination, where those not born and baptized in
the Christian or Catholic faith are already destined to Satan’s dwelling.
The affirmation of this argument is by
simple human logic contrary to the very essence of God. God can never
contradict Himself least He ceased to be God.
My theodicy class in college told me that
God is an Absolute God, Omniscient, Omnipresent, Unmoved Mover and whose
essence is identical with His existence. I have accepted this statement with an
open heart and mind because I am convinced of its philosophical argument and it
takes a whole semester course to discuss the entire proof of God’s existence
and attributes. Since God is Absolute, He is necessarily good and His absolute
goodness won’t permit pre-destination to eternal fire, to think otherwise is to
deny absolute goodness in His being. The concept of God cannot be fully
understood because the word itself is immeasurable and uncontainable within the
limited framework of the human brain. I further argue that the word God is a
matter of hermeneutics and semantics. The Creator or the Absolute is not
necessarily called God in other religions; He may have other names in other
Churches and thus allow other people to worship and pray to their own Creator.
For the Muslims, they may call their Creator as Ala and the Hindus as Brahman.
Certainly, whatever religion there is,
the concept of Creator is all but the same, it is only a matter of nominal
differences.
I don’t want to sound philosophical in
this article but I would encourage openness and religious tolerance among the
faithful of different Churches in order to make life easy not only for you but
that of others too. I would still insist that to debate on religion is an
exercise of futility. Do you really think there is salvation? So far, no human
being has come back to life to testify the existence of heaven and hell?
Everything boils down to just one word -Faith. But as the saying goes, “we
don’t have to die in order to know what is death". It is all a matter of
“Leap of faith” in the words of Soren Kierkegaard, an existential philosopher
from Denmark.